虽然 MARK I 和 II 看起来相似,但存在一些技术差异,主要是新的“脉冲模式”。德格瑞特 说:
这归结于技术细节,但这本质上使 MARK II 更加节能(对于用户来说也更具成本效益),同时功能也更加强大。那么这怎么可能呢?
这要归功于脉冲模式功能,这是一种利用超声波功率的复杂且节省资源的方式。在脉冲模式下,机器使用具有较高能量的短超声波脉冲来清洁表面。然而,由于超声波清洗不是像 MARK I 那样连续进行,因此平均功耗较低,而峰值脉冲明显较高,从而提高了整体清洗效果。
While the MARK I and II look similar, there are some technological differences, primarily the new “Pulse Mode”. Degritter says:
It comes down to the technicalities, but this essentially makes the MARK II more energy-efficient (also more cost-efficient for the user), while still more powerful. So how is that even possible?
That happens thanks to the Pulse Mode functionality, which is a sophisticated and resource-preserving way of harnessing ultrasonic power. With Pulse Mode, the machine uses short ultrasonic pulses with higher energy to clean surfaces. However, since ultrasonic cleaning is not continuously on—as is the case with MARK I—the average power consumption is lower, while the peaking pulses are significantly higher, improving the overall cleaning effect.